On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 02:34:43PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 04:30:30PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > For an upcoming patch where we introduce the i915 VMA, it's ideal to
> > have the drm_mm_node as part of the VMA struct (ie. it's pre-allocated).
> > Part of the conver
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 04:30:30PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> For an upcoming patch where we introduce the i915 VMA, it's ideal to
> have the drm_mm_node as part of the VMA struct (ie. it's pre-allocated).
> Part of the conversion to VMAs is to kill off obj->gtt_space. Doing this
> will break a b
For an upcoming patch where we introduce the i915 VMA, it's ideal to
have the drm_mm_node as part of the VMA struct (ie. it's pre-allocated).
Part of the conversion to VMAs is to kill off obj->gtt_space. Doing this
will break a bunch of code, but amongst them are 2 callers of
drm_mm_create_block(),