On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 04:45:45PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 23:17:06 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 03:41:26PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
> >
> > Since most of the overlay-supporting hw uses physical mem for the o
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 23:17:06 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 03:41:26PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
>
> Since most of the overlay-supporting hw uses physical mem for the overlay
> I think this isn't much worth it: The additional frobbery in
>
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 03:41:26PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
Since most of the overlay-supporting hw uses physical mem for the overlay
I think this isn't much worth it: The additional frobbery in
attach/detach_phys object is likely more work than we'll anything we'l
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c |6 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
index 7a98459..6982191 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
+