On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 02:13:55PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 01:09:37PM +, Mateo Lozano, Oscar wrote:
> > So far, yes, but that´s only because I artificially made intel_lrc.c
> > self-contained, as Daniel requested. What if we need to execute commands
> > from somew
t: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/53] drm/i915/bdw: New logical ring
> > submission mechanism
> > There are 3 cases of non-execbuffer submissions that I can think of: flips,
> > render state, and clear-buffer (proposed patches on the list). I wonder if
> > the
> > right app
> -Original Message-
> From: Jesse Barnes [mailto:jbar...@virtuousgeek.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 6:20 PM
> To: Chris Wilson
> Cc: Mateo Lozano, Oscar; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/53] drm/i915/bdw: New logical ring
>
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 14:13:55 +0100
Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 01:09:37PM +, Mateo Lozano, Oscar wrote:
> > So far, yes, but that´s only because I artificially made
> > intel_lrc.c self-contained, as Daniel requested. What if we need to
> > execute commands from somewhere el
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 04:45:05AM -0700, Mateo Lozano, Oscar wrote:
> Ok, let´s try to extract something positive out of all this.
>
> OPTION A (Ben´s proposal):
>
> > I think the only solution for what Chris is asking for is to implement this
> > as 1
> > context per engine, as opposed to 1 co
> -Original Message-
> From: Volkin, Bradley D
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 8:10 PM
> To: Mateo Lozano, Oscar
> Cc: Chris Wilson; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/53] drm/i915/bdw: New logical ring
> submission mechanism
>
>
Ok, let´s try to extract something positive out of all this.
OPTION A (Ben´s proposal):
> I think the only solution for what Chris is asking for is to implement this
> as 1
> context per engine, as opposed to 1 context with a context object per
> engine. As you correctly stated, I think we all a
ts.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/53] drm/i915/bdw: New logical ring
> > submission mechanism
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 01:36:07PM +, Mateo Lozano, Oscar wrote:
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Chris Wil
ts.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/53] drm/i915/bdw: New logical ring
> > submission mechanism
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 01:36:07PM +, Mateo Lozano, Oscar wrote:
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Chris Wil
ar
> > > Cc: Volkin, Bradley D; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/53] drm/i915/bdw: New logical
> > > ring submission mechanism
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 01:18:35PM +, Mateo Lozano, Oscar
ts.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/53] drm/i915/bdw: New logical ring
> > submission mechanism
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 01:18:35PM +, Mateo Lozano, Oscar wrote:
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Chris Wil
ar
> > > Cc: Volkin, Bradley D; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/53] drm/i915/bdw: New logical
> > > ring submission mechanism
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 01:09:37PM +, Mateo Lozano, Oscar
> wrote:
ts.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/53] drm/i915/bdw: New logical ring
> > submission mechanism
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 01:09:37PM +, Mateo Lozano, Oscar wrote:
> > > So far, yes, but that´s only because I artificially made intel_lrc
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 2:14 PM
> To: Mateo Lozano, Oscar
> Cc: Volkin, Bradley D; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/53] drm/i915/bdw: New logical
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 01:09:37PM +, Mateo Lozano, Oscar wrote:
> So far, yes, but that´s only because I artificially made intel_lrc.c
> self-contained, as Daniel requested. What if we need to execute commands from
> somewhere else, like in intel_gen7_queue_flip()?
>
> And this takes me to
> -Original Message-
> From: Volkin, Bradley D
> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2014 10:01 PM
> To: Mateo Lozano, Oscar
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/53] drm/i915/bdw: New logical ring
> submission mechanism
>
> On Fri, Jun 1
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 08:37:44AM -0700, oscar.ma...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Oscar Mateo
>
> Well, new-ish: if all this code looks familiar, that's because it's
> a clone of the existing submission mechanism (with some modifications
> here and there to adapt it to LRCs and Execlists).
>
> And
From: Oscar Mateo
Well, new-ish: if all this code looks familiar, that's because it's
a clone of the existing submission mechanism (with some modifications
here and there to adapt it to LRCs and Execlists).
And why did we do this? Execlists offer several advantages, like
control over when the GP
18 matches
Mail list logo
