Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/29] drm/i915: create vmas at execbuf

2013-08-07 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 05:00:17PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > In order to transition more of our code over to using a VMA instead of > an pair - we must have the vma accessible at execbuf time. Up > until now, we've only had a VMA when actually binding an object. > > The previous patch helped h

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/29] drm/i915: create vmas at execbuf

2013-07-31 Thread Ben Widawsky
In order to transition more of our code over to using a VMA instead of an pair - we must have the vma accessible at execbuf time. Up until now, we've only had a VMA when actually binding an object. The previous patch helped handle the distinction on bound vs. unbound. This patch will help us catc