Quoting Michal Wajdeczko (2019-03-26 12:47:00)
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 22:49:33 +0100, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
> wrote:
>
> > We have several cases where we don't have forcewake (older gens, GVT and
> > planned display-only uncore), so, instead of checking every time against
> > the various condit
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 22:49:33 +0100, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
wrote:
We have several cases where we don't have forcewake (older gens, GVT and
planned display-only uncore), so, instead of checking every time against
the various condition, save the info in a flag and use that.
Note that this patc
Em seg, 2019-03-25 às 14:49 -0700, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio escreveu:
> We have several cases where we don't have forcewake (older gens, GVT and
> planned display-only uncore), so, instead of checking every time against
> the various condition, save the info in a flag and use that.
>
> Note that thi
We have several cases where we don't have forcewake (older gens, GVT and
planned display-only uncore), so, instead of checking every time against
the various condition, save the info in a flag and use that.
Note that this patch also change the behavior for gen5 with vpgu
enabled, but this is not a
