> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 1:28 PM
> To: Mateo Lozano, Oscar
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915: Rename ctx->obj to ctx-
> >rc
rg
> > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915: Rename ctx->obj to ctx-
> > >rcs_state
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 02:24:13PM +0100, oscar.ma...@intel.com wrote:
> > > From: Oscar Mateo
> > >
> > > This is Execlists preparato
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 10:47 AM
> To: Mateo Lozano, Oscar
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/8] drm/i915: Rename ctx->obj to ctx-
> >rc
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 02:24:13PM +0100, oscar.ma...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Oscar Mateo
>
> This is Execlists preparatory work.
>
> We have already advanced that Logical Ring Contexts have their own kind
> ob backing objects, but everything will be better explained in the Execlists
> series.
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 14:24:13 +0100
oscar.ma...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Oscar Mateo
>
> This is Execlists preparatory work.
>
> We have already advanced that Logical Ring Contexts have their own kind
> ob backing objects, but everything will be better explained in the Execlists
> series. For no
From: Oscar Mateo
This is Execlists preparatory work.
We have already advanced that Logical Ring Contexts have their own kind
ob backing objects, but everything will be better explained in the Execlists
series. For now, suffice it to say that this backing object is only
ever used with the render
