Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: vfuncs for ppgtt

2013-01-28 Thread Damien Lespiau
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 02:44:56PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > From: Daniel Vetter > > Like for the global gtt we want a notch more flexibility here. Only > big change (besides a few tiny function parameter adjustments) was to > move gen6_ppgtt_insert_entries up (and remove _sg_ from its name, w

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: vfuncs for ppgtt

2013-01-25 Thread Ben Widawsky
From: Daniel Vetter Like for the global gtt we want a notch more flexibility here. Only big change (besides a few tiny function parameter adjustments) was to move gen6_ppgtt_insert_entries up (and remove _sg_ from its name, we only have one kind of insert_entries since the last gtt cleanup). We

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: vfuncs for ppgtt

2013-01-24 Thread Ben Widawsky
From: Daniel Vetter Like for the global gtt we want a notch more flexibility here. Only big change (besides a few tiny function parameter adjustments) was to move gen6_ppgtt_insert_entries up (and remove _sg_ from its name, we only have one kind of insert_entries since the last gtt cleanup). We