Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: save some time when waiting the eDP timings

2014-01-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 02:29:51PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 03:09:58PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Thu, 19 Dec 2013, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > > > From: Paulo Zanoni > > > > > > The eDP spec defines some points where after you do action A, you have > > > to wait some

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: save some time when waiting the eDP timings

2014-01-17 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 03:09:58PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 19 Dec 2013, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > > From: Paulo Zanoni > > > > The eDP spec defines some points where after you do action A, you have > > to wait some time before action B. The thing is that in our driver > > action B does no

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: save some time when waiting the eDP timings

2014-01-17 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > From: Paulo Zanoni > > The eDP spec defines some points where after you do action A, you have > to wait some time before action B. The thing is that in our driver > action B does not happen exactly after action A, but we still use > msleep() calls direct

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: save some time when waiting the eDP timings

2014-01-03 Thread Paulo Zanoni
From: Paulo Zanoni The eDP spec defines some points where after you do action A, you have to wait some time before action B. The thing is that in our driver action B does not happen exactly after action A, but we still use msleep() calls directly. What this patch does is that we record the timest

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: save some time when waiting the eDP timings

2014-01-03 Thread Paulo Zanoni
2013/12/20 Jani Nikula : > On Thu, 19 Dec 2013, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> From: Paulo Zanoni >> >> The eDP spec defines some points where after you do action A, you have >> to wait some time before action B. The thing is that in our driver >> action B does not happen exactly after action A, but we s

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: save some time when waiting the eDP timings

2013-12-20 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 11:30:15AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 19 Dec 2013, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > > From: Paulo Zanoni > > > > The eDP spec defines some points where after you do action A, you have > > to wait some time before action B. The thing is that in our driver > > action B does no

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: save some time when waiting the eDP timings

2013-12-20 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > From: Paulo Zanoni > > The eDP spec defines some points where after you do action A, you have > to wait some time before action B. The thing is that in our driver > action B does not happen exactly after action A, but we still use > msleep() calls direct

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: save some time when waiting the eDP timings

2013-12-19 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:29:40 -0200 Paulo Zanoni wrote: > From: Paulo Zanoni > > The eDP spec defines some points where after you do action A, you have > to wait some time before action B. The thing is that in our driver > action B does not happen exactly after action A, but we still use > mslee

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: save some time when waiting the eDP timings

2013-12-19 Thread Paulo Zanoni
From: Paulo Zanoni The eDP spec defines some points where after you do action A, you have to wait some time before action B. The thing is that in our driver action B does not happen exactly after action A, but we still use msleep() calls directly. What this patch does is that we record the timest