On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 09:15:25AM -0700, Steve Aarnio wrote:
> On 06/11/2014 08:41 AM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> >On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 17:39:29 +0200
> >Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> >>On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Jesse Barnes
> >>wrote:
> - If you have a machine which uses tiled framebuffers a
On 06/11/2014 08:41 AM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 17:39:29 +0200
Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
- If you have a machine which uses tiled framebuffers and enables
swizzling in the BIOS your code will a) drop the swizzle setup in
g
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 17:39:29 +0200
Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Jesse Barnes
> wrote:
> >> - If you have a machine which uses tiled framebuffers and enables
> >> swizzling in the BIOS your code will a) drop the swizzle setup in
> >> gem_init_hw, breaking resume b)
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>> - If you have a machine which uses tiled framebuffers and enables
>> swizzling in the BIOS your code will a) drop the swizzle setup in
>> gem_init_hw, breaking resume b) not set the swizzle settings correctly
>> in swizzle_detect, break
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 11:23:26 +0200
Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:45:38PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 21:33:27 +0200
> > Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Jesse Barnes
> > > wrote:
> > > > Yes, that's what I do below... I
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:45:38PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 21:33:27 +0200
> Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Jesse Barnes
> > wrote:
> > > Yes, that's what I do below... I even added it to the changelog:
> > > http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/p
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 21:33:27 +0200
Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Jesse Barnes
> wrote:
> > Yes, that's what I do below... I even added it to the changelog:
> > http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/27223/
> >
> > Did you miss the later hunk in intel_display.c?
> >
> >
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> Yes, that's what I do below... I even added it to the changelog:
> http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/27223/
>
> Did you miss the later hunk in intel_display.c?
>
> What we try to do here is enable swizzling if possible, which we can do
>
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 16:02:51 +0200
Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 11:24:28AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > Some machines (like MBAs) might use a tiled framebuffer but not enable
> > display swizzling at boot time. We want to preserve that configuration
> > if possible to prevent
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 11:24:28AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> Some machines (like MBAs) might use a tiled framebuffer but not enable
> display swizzling at boot time. We want to preserve that configuration
> if possible to prevent a boot time mode set. On IVB+ it shouldn't
> affect performance
Some machines (like MBAs) might use a tiled framebuffer but not enable
display swizzling at boot time. We want to preserve that configuration
if possible to prevent a boot time mode set. On IVB+ it shouldn't
affect performance anyway since the memory controller does internal
swizzling anyway.
Fo
11 matches
Mail list logo
