On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 09:18:24PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 05:00:36PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > From: Paulo Zanoni
> >
> > We currently disable the ERR_INT interrupts while running the IRQ
> > handler because we fear that if we do an unclaimed register access
> >
From: Paulo Zanoni
We currently disable the ERR_INT interrupts while running the IRQ
handler because we fear that if we do an unclaimed register access
from inside the IRQ handler we'll keep triggering the IRQ handler
forever.
The problem is that since we always disable the ERR_INT interrupts at
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 05:00:36PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> From: Paulo Zanoni
>
> We currently disable the ERR_INT interrupts while running the IRQ
> handler because we fear that if we do an unclaimed register access
> from inside the IRQ handler we'll keep triggering the IRQ handler
> forev