Hi
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> It's racy, creating mmap offsets is a slowpath, so better to remove it
> to avoid drivers doing broken things.
>
> The only user is i915, and it's ok there because everything (well
> almost) is protected by dev->struct_mutex in i915-gem.
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 02:47:49AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> [auto build test WARNING on drm/drm-next -- if it's inappropriate base,
> please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]
>
> url:
> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Daniel-Vetter/drm-Updat
Hi Daniel,
[auto build test WARNING on drm/drm-next -- if it's inappropriate base, please
suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Daniel-Vetter/drm-Update-GEM-refcounting-docs/20151023-011317
config: x86_64-randconfig-s1-10230205 (att
Hi Daniel,
[auto build test ERROR on drm/drm-next -- if it's inappropriate base, please
suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Daniel-Vetter/drm-Update-GEM-refcounting-docs/20151023-011317
config: i386-randconfig-s1-201542 (attached
It's racy, creating mmap offsets is a slowpath, so better to remove it
to avoid drivers doing broken things.
The only user is i915, and it's ok there because everything (well
almost) is protected by dev->struct_mutex in i915-gem.
While at it add a note in the create_mmap_offset kerneldoc that
dri
