Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: s/seqno/request/ tracking inside objects

2014-09-11 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:51:37PM +0100, John Harrison wrote: >Will the PPGTT fix be sent out soon? If not, can you just send me a quick >fix directly? I was hoping to gather some feedback before the next send. Patch incorporated into http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~ickle/linux-2.6/commit/?

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: s/seqno/request/ tracking inside objects

2014-09-11 Thread John Harrison
Will the PPGTT fix be sent out soon? If not, can you just send me a quick fix directly? Also, noticed that in 'submit_execbuf()', if the 'copy_from_user()' call fails then it jumps to the error return but does not set 'ret' thus will actually return success. Also, there seems to be a mix of 'g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: s/seqno/request/ tracking inside objects

2014-09-10 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 03:14:29PM +0100, John Harrison wrote: > I pulled a fresh tree on Monday and applied this set of patches. > There were two conflicts. It looks like nightly does not have > 'i915_gem_context_setparam_ioctl' yet but the tree the patches came > from does. Also, my tree has 'DRM