On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 11:17:08PM +0100, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On 01/31/2012 04:47 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On gen5 we also need to correctly set up swizzling in the display
> > scanout engine, but only there. Consolidate this into the same
> > function.
> >
> > This has a small effect on ums
On 01/31/2012 04:47 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On gen5 we also need to correctly set up swizzling in the display
> scanout engine, but only there. Consolidate this into the same
> function.
>
> This has a small effect on ums setups - the kernel now also sets this
> bit in addition to userspace set
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 01:37:29PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 04:47:55PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On gen5 we also need to correctly set up swizzling in the display
> > scanout engine, but only there. Consolidate this into the same
> > function.
> >
> > This has a s
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 04:47:55PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On gen5 we also need to correctly set up swizzling in the display
> scanout engine, but only there. Consolidate this into the same
> function.
>
> This has a small effect on ums setups - the kernel now also sets this
> bit in additio
On gen5 we also need to correctly set up swizzling in the display
scanout engine, but only there. Consolidate this into the same
function.
This has a small effect on ums setups - the kernel now also sets this
bit in addition to userspace setting it. Given that this code only
runs when userspace ei
