On 15/02/16 09:47, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 01:01:34PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 29/01/16 16:49, Chris Wilson wrote:
As we add the VMA to the request early, it may be cancelled during
execbuf reservation. This will leave the context object pointing to a
I don't get
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 01:01:34PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> On 29/01/16 16:49, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >As we add the VMA to the request early, it may be cancelled during
> >execbuf reservation. This will leave the context object pointing to a
>
> I don't get it, request is created after the r
On 29/01/16 16:49, Chris Wilson wrote:
As we add the VMA to the request early, it may be cancelled during
execbuf reservation. This will leave the context object pointing to a
I don't get it, request is created after the reservation.
dangling request; i915_wait_request() simply skips the wa
As we add the VMA to the request early, it may be cancelled during
execbuf reservation. This will leave the context object pointing to a
dangling request; i915_wait_request() simply skips the wait and so we
may unbind the object whilst it is still active.
However, if at any point we make a change
