Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Complete requests in nop_submit_request

2016-11-18 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 18/11/2016 13:33, Chris Wilson wrote: On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 03:03:21PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote: Tvrtko Ursulin writes: On 18/11/2016 09:37, Chris Wilson wrote: Since the submit/execute split in commit d55ac5bf97c6 ("drm/i915: Defer transfer onto execution timeline to actual hw submi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Complete requests in nop_submit_request

2016-11-18 Thread Chris Wilson
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 03:03:21PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote: > Tvrtko Ursulin writes: > > > On 18/11/2016 09:37, Chris Wilson wrote: > >> Since the submit/execute split in commit d55ac5bf97c6 ("drm/i915: Defer > >> transfer onto execution timeline to actual hw submission") the > >> global seqno

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Complete requests in nop_submit_request

2016-11-18 Thread Mika Kuoppala
Tvrtko Ursulin writes: > On 18/11/2016 09:37, Chris Wilson wrote: >> Since the submit/execute split in commit d55ac5bf97c6 ("drm/i915: Defer >> transfer onto execution timeline to actual hw submission") the >> global seqno advance was deferred until the submit_request callback. >> After wedging t

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Complete requests in nop_submit_request

2016-11-18 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 18/11/2016 09:37, Chris Wilson wrote: Since the submit/execute split in commit d55ac5bf97c6 ("drm/i915: Defer transfer onto execution timeline to actual hw submission") the global seqno advance was deferred until the submit_request callback. After wedging the GPU, we were installing a nop_sub

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Complete requests in nop_submit_request

2016-11-18 Thread Chris Wilson
Since the submit/execute split in commit d55ac5bf97c6 ("drm/i915: Defer transfer onto execution timeline to actual hw submission") the global seqno advance was deferred until the submit_request callback. After wedging the GPU, we were installing a nop_submit_request handler (to avoid waking up the