On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 09:40:48AM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> On ti, 2016-10-04 at 15:54 +0200, Michał Winiarski wrote:
> > Since "Dynamic page table allocations" were introduced, our page tables
> > can grow (being dynamically allocated) with address space range usage.
> > Unfortunately, thei
On ti, 2016-10-04 at 15:54 +0200, Michał Winiarski wrote:
> Since "Dynamic page table allocations" were introduced, our page tables
> can grow (being dynamically allocated) with address space range usage.
> Unfortunately, their lifetime is bound to vm. This is not a huge problem
> when we're not us
Since "Dynamic page table allocations" were introduced, our page tables
can grow (being dynamically allocated) with address space range usage.
Unfortunately, their lifetime is bound to vm. This is not a huge problem
when we're not using softpin - drm_mm is creating an upper bound on used
range by c
