Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] igt/gem_workarounds: igt to test workaround registers

2014-08-26 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 03:52:12PM +0100, Arun Siluvery wrote: > Some of the workarounds are lost followed by a gpu reset, suspend/resume; > this patch adds a test which compares register state before and after > the test scenario. > > This test currently verifies only bdw workarounds. > > Signed

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] igt/gem_workarounds: igt to test workaround registers

2014-08-20 Thread Siluvery, Arun
On 20/08/2014 16:37, Thomas Wood wrote: On 20 August 2014 15:52, Arun Siluvery wrote: Some of the workarounds are lost followed by a gpu reset, suspend/resume; this patch adds a test which compares register state before and after the test scenario. This test currently verifies only bdw workaro

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] igt/gem_workarounds: igt to test workaround registers

2014-08-20 Thread Thomas Wood
On 20 August 2014 15:52, Arun Siluvery wrote: > Some of the workarounds are lost followed by a gpu reset, suspend/resume; > this patch adds a test which compares register state before and after > the test scenario. > > This test currently verifies only bdw workarounds. Just a few points from an i

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] igt/gem_workarounds: igt to test workaround registers

2014-08-20 Thread Arun Siluvery
Some of the workarounds are lost followed by a gpu reset, suspend/resume; this patch adds a test which compares register state before and after the test scenario. This test currently verifies only bdw workarounds. Signed-off-by: Arun Siluvery --- tests/Makefile.sources | 1 + tests/gem_worka