On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:54:13 +0800, "Zhigang Gong"
wrote:
> BTW, May I have your review tag in the commits which get reviewed by you.
> Thanks.
I'm hoping that you will rebase the series into something that can be
cleanly merged - i.e. I don't expect the patches in their current form
and order t
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 8:25 PM
> To: Zhigang Gong; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: zhigang.g...@linux.intel.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] glamor: Address GLAMOR/UXA flushing problem.
>
> On Tue,
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:36:14 +0800, Zhigang Gong
wrote:
> This commit introduces a new function in UXA layer need_flush
> which is used to let the UXA layer to notify the lower layer
> that some pixmap get modified by GLAMOR. And then the intel
> driver could know it need to flush front buffer la
This commit introduces a new function in UXA layer need_flush
which is used to let the UXA layer to notify the lower layer
that some pixmap get modified by GLAMOR. And then the intel
driver could know it need to flush front buffer latter.
This commit also adds some necessary flushing pointis for U
