On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 07:11:38PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 05:43:40PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 06:25:12PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä
> > >
> > > Now that we've constrained the clipped source rectangle such
> >
On 11/20/19 6:11 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 05:43:40PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 06:25:12PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
>>> From: Ville Syrjälä
>>>
>>> Now that we've constrained the clipped source rectangle such
>>> that it can't have negative
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 05:43:40PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 06:25:12PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > Now that we've constrained the clipped source rectangle such
> > that it can't have negative dimensions doing the same for the
> > dst re
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 06:25:12PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> Now that we've constrained the clipped source rectangle such
> that it can't have negative dimensions doing the same for the
> dst rectangle seems appropriate. Should at least result in
> the clipped src and
From: Ville Syrjälä
Now that we've constrained the clipped source rectangle such
that it can't have negative dimensions doing the same for the
dst rectangle seems appropriate. Should at least result in
the clipped src and dst rectangles being a bit more consistent
with each other.
Cc: Benjamin G
