2013/9/3 Rodrigo Vivi :
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
>> From: Paulo Zanoni
>>
>> We currently use the recommended values from BSpec, but the VBT
>> specifies the correct value to use for the hardware we have, so use
>> it. We also fall back to the recommended value in c
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:37:27AM -0300, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > From: Paulo Zanoni
> >
> > We currently use the recommended values from BSpec, but the VBT
> > specifies the correct value to use for the hardware we have, so use
> > it. We a
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> From: Paulo Zanoni
>
> We currently use the recommended values from BSpec, but the VBT
> specifies the correct value to use for the hardware we have, so use
> it. We also fall back to the recommended value in case we can't find
> the VBT.
>
From: Paulo Zanoni
We currently use the recommended values from BSpec, but the VBT
specifies the correct value to use for the hardware we have, so use
it. We also fall back to the recommended value in case we can't find
the VBT.
In addition, this code also provides some infrastructure to parse m
From: Paulo Zanoni
We currently use the recommended values from BSpec, but the VBT
specifies the correct value to use for the hardware we have, so use
it. We also fall back to the recommended value in case we can't find
the VBT.
In addition, this code also provides some infrastructure to parse m
