Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Rewrite IVB FDI bifurcation conflict checks

2015-03-12 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 09:35:33AM +0200, Ander Conselvan De Oliveira wrote: > (for the series) > Reviewed-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira Both merged to dinq, thanks. -Daniel > > On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 18:52 +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > Ignore th

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Rewrite IVB FDI bifurcation conflict checks

2015-03-12 Thread Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
(for the series) Reviewed-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 18:52 +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Ignore the current state of the pipe and just check crtc_state->enable > and the number of FDI lanes required. This means we don't accident

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Rewrite IVB FDI bifurcation conflict checks

2015-03-11 Thread ville . syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä Ignore the current state of the pipe and just check crtc_state->enable and the number of FDI lanes required. This means we don't accidentally mistake the FDI lanes as being available of one of the pipes just happens to be disabled at the time of the check. Also we no longer co