On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 01:15:39PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 12:12:41PM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> > Chris Wilson writes:
> >
> > > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 08:17:22PM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> > >> We initialize the internal read pointer to zero on init/reset,
>
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 12:12:41PM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> Chris Wilson writes:
>
> > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 08:17:22PM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> >> We initialize the internal read pointer to zero on init/reset,
> >> but only the reset will actually zero the write pointer.
> >> This me
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 12:12:41PM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> Chris Wilson writes:
>
> > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 08:17:22PM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> >> We initialize the internal read pointer to zero on init/reset,
> >> but only the reset will actually zero the write pointer.
> >> This me
Chris Wilson writes:
> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 08:17:22PM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
>> We initialize the internal read pointer to zero on init/reset,
>> but only the reset will actually zero the write pointer.
>> This means that on module reload we might re-read context
>> status buffers that w
> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Chris Wilson
> Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 5:11 PM
> To: Mika Kuoppala
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; m...@iki.fi
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] d
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 08:17:22PM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> We initialize the internal read pointer to zero on init/reset,
> but only the reset will actually zero the write pointer.
> This means that on module reload we might re-read context
> status buffers that were written prior reload.
>
We initialize the internal read pointer to zero on init/reset,
but only the reset will actually zero the write pointer.
This means that on module reload we might re-read context
status buffers that were written prior reload.
It is safest just to let the hardware keep track of the read pointer,
so