Quoting Ville Syrjälä (2017-10-27 21:08:55)
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 08:42:40PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > If we are transfering an fb from one crtc to another, we will keep FBC
> > activated (due to only having a single pipe) but then we will call
> > intel_fbc_disable() from intel_atomic_com
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 08:42:40PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> If we are transfering an fb from one crtc to another, we will keep FBC
> activated (due to only having a single pipe) but then we will call
> intel_fbc_disable() from intel_atomic_commit_tail() on the old pipe
> before enabling the new
If we are transfering an fb from one crtc to another, we will keep FBC
activated (due to only having a single pipe) but then we will call
intel_fbc_disable() from intel_atomic_commit_tail() on the old pipe
before enabling the new pipe. However, we insist that before disabling
FBC, it is deactivated
