Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] RFC: soft/hardlookup: taint kernel

2019-05-09 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 11:24 AM Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > On (05/02/19 21:42), Daniel Vetter wrote: > [..] > > @@ -469,6 +469,8 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart watchdog_timer_fn(struct > > hrtimer *hrtimer) > > add_taint(TAINT_SOFTLOCKUP, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK); > > if (

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] RFC: soft/hardlookup: taint kernel

2019-05-02 Thread Laurence Oberman
On Thu, 2019-05-02 at 21:42 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > There's the soft/hardlookup_panic sysctls, but that's a bit an > extreme > measure. As a fallback taint at least the machine. > > Our CI uses this to decide when a reboot is necessary, plus to figure > out whether the kernel is still happy.

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] RFC: soft/hardlookup: taint kernel

2019-05-02 Thread Daniel Vetter
There's the soft/hardlookup_panic sysctls, but that's a bit an extreme measure. As a fallback taint at least the machine. Our CI uses this to decide when a reboot is necessary, plus to figure out whether the kernel is still happy. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Ingo Molnar