Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/81] drm/i915: simplify possible_clones computation

2012-07-12 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 03:10:21PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > Hi > > I like your idea. > > 2012/7/11 Daniel Vetter : > > Intel hw only has one MUX for encoders, so outputs are either not > > cloneable or all in the same group of cloneable outputs. > > I don't agree with this sentence... Our do

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/81] drm/i915: simplify possible_clones computation

2012-07-12 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Hi I like your idea. 2012/7/11 Daniel Vetter : > Intel hw only has one MUX for encoders, so outputs are either not > cloneable or all in the same group of cloneable outputs. I don't agree with this sentence... Our documentation contains sections called "Simultaneous Display Capabilities on a Sin

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/81] drm/i915: simplify possible_clones computation

2012-07-11 Thread Daniel Vetter
Intel hw only has one MUX for encoders, so outputs are either not cloneable or all in the same group of cloneable outputs. This neatly simplifies the code and allows us to ditch some ugly if cascades in the dp and hdmi init code (well, we need these if cascades for other stuff still, but that can b