Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/16] drm/i915: Add selftests for object allocation, phys

2016-12-17 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 05:10:46PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > >+int i915_gem_object_selftests(void) > >+{ > >+static const struct i915_subtest tests[] = { > >+SUBTEST(igt_gem_object), > >+SUBTEST(igt_phys_object), > >+}; > >+ > >+return i915_subtests(tests, N

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/16] drm/i915: Add selftests for object allocation, phys

2016-12-13 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 07/12/2016 13:58, Chris Wilson wrote: The phys object is a rarely used device (only very old machines require a chunk of physically contiguous pages for a few hardware interactions). As such, it is not exercised by CI and to combat that we want to add a test that exercises the phys object on

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/16] drm/i915: Add selftests for object allocation, phys

2016-12-07 Thread Chris Wilson
The phys object is a rarely used device (only very old machines require a chunk of physically contiguous pages for a few hardware interactions). As such, it is not exercised by CI and to combat that we want to add a test that exercises the phys object on all platforms. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson