On 25/04/2019 11:30, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-04-25 11:20:47)
On 25/04/2019 10:19, Chris Wilson wrote:
Having removed the urge to modify the engine_mask at runtime, we can
promote the num_engines from a runtime calculation to a static and push
it into the device_info t
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-04-25 11:20:47)
>
> On 25/04/2019 10:19, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Having removed the urge to modify the engine_mask at runtime, we can
> > promote the num_engines from a runtime calculation to a static and push
> > it into the device_info tables.
>
> What about fused o
On 25/04/2019 10:19, Chris Wilson wrote:
Having removed the urge to modify the engine_mask at runtime, we can
promote the num_engines from a runtime calculation to a static and push
it into the device_info tables.
What about fused off engines (intel_device_info_init_mmio)?
I don't see the pat
On Thu, 25 Apr 2019, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Having removed the urge to modify the engine_mask at runtime, we can
> promote the num_engines from a runtime calculation to a static and push
> it into the device_info tables.
\o/
Acked-by: Jani Nikula
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
> Cc: Tvrtko
Having removed the urge to modify the engine_mask at runtime, we can
promote the num_engines from a runtime calculation to a static and push
it into the device_info tables.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin
Cc: Jani Nikula
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c | 3 --
