On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:50:46AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > > - if (gt_iir & (GT_GEN6_BLT_CS_ERROR_INTERRUPT |
> > > - GT_GEN6_BSD_CS_ERROR_INTERRUPT |
> > > - GT_RENDER_CS_ERROR_INTERRUPT)) {
> > > + if (gt_iir & (GT_BLT_CS_ERROR_INTERRUPT |
> > > +
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 03:01:54PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 05:59:24PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > The motivation here is we're going to add some new interrupt definitions
> > and handling outside of the GT interrupts which is all we've managed so
> > far (with some
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 05:59:24PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> The motivation here is we're going to add some new interrupt definitions
> and handling outside of the GT interrupts which is all we've managed so
> far (with some RPS exceptions). By consolidating the names in the future
> we can make
The motivation here is we're going to add some new interrupt definitions
and handling outside of the GT interrupts which is all we've managed so
far (with some RPS exceptions). By consolidating the names in the future
we can make thing a bit cleaner as we don't need to define register
names twice,
The motivation here is we're going to add some new interrupt definitions
and handling outside of the GT interrupts which is all we've managed so
far (with some RPS exceptions). By consolidating the names in the future
we can make thing a bit cleaner as we don't need to define register
names twice,
