On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 08:03:27PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:44:47AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 08:13:25AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 02:52:40PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > > > This appears to not actually be
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:44:47AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 08:13:25AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 02:52:40PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > > This appears to not actually be needed on the current code. Just putting
> > > it on the ML so we can
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 08:13:25AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 02:52:40PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > This appears to not actually be needed on the current code. Just putting
> > it on the ML so we can point bug reports at it later.
> >
> > As pointed out by Ville, the
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 02:52:40PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> This appears to not actually be needed on the current code. Just putting
> it on the ML so we can point bug reports at it later.
>
> As pointed out by Ville, the current code is "broken" since we do
> FORCE_RESTORE, and RESTORE_INHIBI
This appears to not actually be needed on the current code. Just putting
it on the ML so we can point bug reports at it later.
As pointed out by Ville, the current code is "broken" since we do
FORCE_RESTORE, and RESTORE_INHIBIT on the same dword. Anecdotally, this
seems fine.
Signed-off-by: Ben W
This appears to not actually be needed on the current code. Just putting
it on the ML so we can point bug reports at it later.
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c | 7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.
