Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/13] drm/i915: remove in_dbg_master check from intel_fbc.c

2015-11-06 Thread Jason Wessel
On 11/04/2015 02:13 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote: On 11/04/2015 11:10 AM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: From our maintainer Daniel Vetter a few days ago: "Oh dear this is dead code. kdbg uses the fbcon, which always uses untiled, which means fbc will never be enabled. Also we have 0 users and 0 test c

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/13] drm/i915: remove in_dbg_master check from intel_fbc.c

2015-11-04 Thread Jesse Barnes
On 11/04/2015 12:26 PM, Zanoni, Paulo R wrote: > Em Qua, 2015-11-04 às 14:19 -0600, Jason Wessel escreveu: >> On 11/04/2015 02:13 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote: >>> On 11/04/2015 11:10 AM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: From our maintainer Daniel Vetter a few days ago: "Oh dear this is dead code. kdbg

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/13] drm/i915: remove in_dbg_master check from intel_fbc.c

2015-11-04 Thread Zanoni, Paulo R
Em Qua, 2015-11-04 às 14:19 -0600, Jason Wessel escreveu: > On 11/04/2015 02:13 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > On 11/04/2015 11:10 AM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > > >  From our maintainer Daniel Vetter a few days ago: > > >    "Oh dear this is dead code. kdbg uses the fbcon, which always > > > uses > > >   

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/13] drm/i915: remove in_dbg_master check from intel_fbc.c

2015-11-04 Thread Jesse Barnes
On 11/04/2015 11:10 AM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > From our maintainer Daniel Vetter a few days ago: > "Oh dear this is dead code. kdbg uses the fbcon, which always uses > untiled, which means fbc will never be enabled. Also we have 0 users > and 0 test coverage for kdbg on top of i915 (Jesse impl

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/13] drm/i915: remove in_dbg_master check from intel_fbc.c

2015-11-04 Thread Paulo Zanoni
From our maintainer Daniel Vetter a few days ago: "Oh dear this is dead code. kdbg uses the fbcon, which always uses untiled, which means fbc will never be enabled. Also we have 0 users and 0 test coverage for kdbg on top of i915 (Jesse implemented it for fun years back). Imo just remove al