On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 05:00:09PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:14:05AM +0530, Arun R Murthy wrote:
> >
> > On Friday 06 March 2015 12:49 AM, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä
> > >
> > > DDR DVFS introduces massive memory latencies which c
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:14:05AM +0530, Arun R Murthy wrote:
>
> On Friday 06 March 2015 12:49 AM, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > DDR DVFS introduces massive memory latencies which can't be handled by
> > the PND deadline stuff. Instead the watermarks will
On Friday 06 March 2015 12:49 AM, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä
DDR DVFS introduces massive memory latencies which can't be handled by
the PND deadline stuff. Instead the watermarks will need to be
programmed to compensate for the latency and the deadlines will need
On 03/05/2015 11:19 AM, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> DDR DVFS introduces massive memory latencies which can't be handled by
> the PND deadline stuff. Instead the watermarks will need to be
> programmed to compensate for the latency and the deadlines will need to
From: Ville Syrjälä
DDR DVFS introduces massive memory latencies which can't be handled by
the PND deadline stuff. Instead the watermarks will need to be
programmed to compensate for the latency and the deadlines will need to
be programmed to tight fixed values. That means DDR DVFS can only be
en