On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:47:18PM +, Zanoni, Paulo R wrote:
> Em Seg, 2016-08-15 às 21:55 +0100, Chris Wilson escreveu:
> > So this change is broken as intel_fbc_pre_update() depends upon state
> > derived from the pinned framebuffer object but is being called by
> > intel_crtc_page_flip() bef
Em Seg, 2016-08-15 às 21:55 +0100, Chris Wilson escreveu:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:35:44AM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> >
> > We'll now call intel_fbc_pre_update instead of intel_fbc_deactivate
> > during atomic commits. This will continue to guarantee that we
> > deactivate FBC and it will al
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:35:44AM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> We'll now call intel_fbc_pre_update instead of intel_fbc_deactivate
> during atomic commits. This will continue to guarantee that we
> deactivate FBC and it will also update the state checking structures
> at the correct time. Then, la
We'll now call intel_fbc_pre_update instead of intel_fbc_deactivate
during atomic commits. This will continue to guarantee that we
deactivate FBC and it will also update the state checking structures
at the correct time. Then, later, at the point where we were calling
intel_fbc_update, we'll only n
