On 28/11/2016 11:35, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:15:27AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 25/11/2016 09:30, Chris Wilson wrote:
i915_guc_info() (part of debugfs output) tries to avoid holding
struct_mutex for a long period by copying onto the stack. This causes a
warning tha
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:15:27AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 25/11/2016 09:30, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >i915_guc_info() (part of debugfs output) tries to avoid holding
> >struct_mutex for a long period by copying onto the stack. This causes a
> >warning that the stack frame is massive, so
On 25/11/2016 09:30, Chris Wilson wrote:
i915_guc_info() (part of debugfs output) tries to avoid holding
struct_mutex for a long period by copying onto the stack. This causes a
warning that the stack frame is massive, so stop doing that. We can even
forgo holding the struct_mutex here as that do
i915_guc_info() (part of debugfs output) tries to avoid holding
struct_mutex for a long period by copying onto the stack. This causes a
warning that the stack frame is massive, so stop doing that. We can even
forgo holding the struct_mutex here as that doesn't serialise the values
being read (and t
