On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 23:52:43 +1000, Ted Phelps wrote:
> Grr... Sorry, I've replied to the wrong patch. That one is fine. This
> is the problematic one:
>
> commit fc8cf546f12a353bfd344bf922649c0d064fc3f0
Yeah, I have already rewritten that one. The current staging is surviving
gem_stress
Ted Phelps writes:
> Chris Wilson writes:
> > Whenever we finish reading an object through a fence, for safety we
> > clear any GPU read domain and so invalidate any TLBs associated with
> > the fenced region upon its next use.
>
> This change is causing a regression on my Sandybridge CPU (i7 2600
Chris Wilson writes:
> Whenever we finish reading an object through a fence, for safety we
> clear any GPU read domain and so invalidate any TLBs associated with
> the fenced region upon its next use.
This change is causing a regression on my Sandybridge CPU (i7 2600K).
The colours all look right
Whenever we finish reading an object through a fence, for safety we
clear any GPU read domain and so invalidate any TLBs associated with
the fenced region upon its next use.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c|2 ++
drivers/
