Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/12] Add glamor back into the driver

Keith Packard writes: > This adds glamor support back into the driver, but instad of going > through UXA, this uses it directly instead. This is hard to read with the conditionalizing all of the UXA code in the same commit as adding the glamor code. Then there are a bunch of unrelated whitespac

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/12] Add glamor back into the driver

Eric Anholt writes: > Keith Packard writes: > >> This adds glamor support back into the driver, but instad of going >> through UXA, this uses it directly instead. > > This is hard to read with the conditionalizing all of the UXA code in > the same commit as adding the glamor code. Then there ar

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/12] Add glamor back into the driver

This adds glamor support back into the driver, but instad of going through UXA, this uses it directly instead. Signed-off-by: Keith Packard --- src/uxa/intel.h | 17 +++ src/uxa/intel_display.c | 30 - src/uxa/intel_dri.c | 20 +++ src/uxa/intel_driver.c | 247 +++