On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 13:47:52 -0700
Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 10:41:56 +0100
> Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> >
> > + /* DP has a bunch of special case unfortunately, so mark the pipe
> > +* accordingly. */
> > + bool has_dp_encoder;
>
> Looks pretty good, but I don't think t
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 10:41:56 +0100
Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> + /* DP has a bunch of special case unfortunately, so mark the pipe
> + * accordingly. */
> + bool has_dp_encoder;
Looks pretty good, but I don't think this field is used anywhere?
Maybe it belongs in a later patch?
Also
There's a rather decent confusion going on around transcoder m_n
values. So let's clarify:
- All dp encoders need this, either on the pch transcoder if it's a
pch port, or on the cpu transcoder/pipe if it's a cpu port.
- fdi links need to have the right m_n values for the fdi link set in
the cp
There's a rather decent confusion going on around transcoder m_n
values. So let's clarify:
- All dp encoders need this, either on the pch transcoder if it's a
pch port, or on the cpu transcoder/pipe if it's a cpu port.
- fdi links need to have the right m_n values for the fdi link set in
the cp
There's a rather decent confusion going on around transcoder m_n
values. So let's clarify:
- All dp encoders need this, either on the pch transcoder if it's a
pch port, or on the cpu transcoder/pipe if it's a cpu port.
- fdi links need to have the right m_n values for the fdi link set in
the cp
