Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: vfuncs for gtt_clear_range/insert_entries

2013-01-29 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 07:42:57AM +, Damien Lespiau wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 02:44:55PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > From: Daniel Vetter > > > > We have a few too many differences here, so finally take the prepared > > abstraction and run with it. A few smaller changes are required

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: vfuncs for gtt_clear_range/insert_entries

2013-01-28 Thread Damien Lespiau
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 02:44:55PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > From: Daniel Vetter > > We have a few too many differences here, so finally take the prepared > abstraction and run with it. A few smaller changes are required to get > things into shape: > > - move i915_cache_level up since we need

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: vfuncs for gtt_clear_range/insert_entries

2013-01-25 Thread Ben Widawsky
From: Daniel Vetter We have a few too many differences here, so finally take the prepared abstraction and run with it. A few smaller changes are required to get things into shape: - move i915_cache_level up since we need it in the gt funcs - split up i915_ggtt_clear_range and move the two functi

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: vfuncs for gtt_clear_range/insert_entries

2013-01-24 Thread Ben Widawsky
From: Daniel Vetter We have a few too many differences here, so finally take the prepared abstraction and run with it. A few smaller changes are required to get things into shape: - move i915_cache_level up since we need it in the gt funcs - split up i915_ggtt_clear_range and move the two functi