Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: don't restore LVDS enable state blindly v2

On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 05:39:49PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > Hi > > 2013/2/19 Jesse Barnes : > > We still rely on a few LVDS bits, but restoring the enable bit can cause > > trouble at this point, so don't. > > > > v2: use the right mask to prevent restore (Daniel) > > conditionalize on KMS

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: don't restore LVDS enable state blindly v2

Hi 2013/2/19 Jesse Barnes : > We still rely on a few LVDS bits, but restoring the enable bit can cause > trouble at this point, so don't. > > v2: use the right mask to prevent restore (Daniel) > conditionalize on KMS support (Denial) > > Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: don't restore LVDS enable state blindly v2

We still rely on a few LVDS bits, but restoring the enable bit can cause trouble at this point, so don't. v2: use the right mask to prevent restore (Daniel) conditionalize on KMS support (Denial) Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c |8 ++-- 1 file cha

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: don't restore LVDS enable state blindly v2

We still rely on a few LVDS bits, but restoring the enable bit can cause trouble at this point, so don't. v2: use the right mask to prevent restore (Daniel) conditionalize on KMS support (Denial) Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c |8 ++-- 1 file cha

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: don't restore LVDS enable state blindly

On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 22:10:39 +0100 Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:42:32PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > We still rely on a few LVDS bits, but restoring the enable bit can cause > > trouble at this point, so don't. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes > > --- > > drivers/gpu/

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: don't restore LVDS enable state blindly

We still rely on a few LVDS bits, but restoring the enable bit can cause trouble at this point, so don't. Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c |4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c b/drivers/

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: don't restore LVDS enable state blindly

On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:42:32PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > We still rely on a few LVDS bits, but restoring the enable bit can cause > trouble at this point, so don't. > > Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c |4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+),

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: don't restore LVDS enable state blindly

We still rely on a few LVDS bits, but restoring the enable bit can cause trouble at this point, so don't. Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c |4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_suspend.c b/drivers/