Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: preserve SSC if previously set v2

2014-06-10 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 11:24:27AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > Some machines may have a broken VBT or no VBT at all, but we still want > to use SSC there. So check for it and keep it enabled if we see it > already on. Based on an earlier fix from Kristian. > > v2: honor modparam if set too (Dan

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: preserve SSC if previously set v2

2014-06-06 Thread Chris Wilson
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 02:04:21PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > Do we have any need to differentiate between this and what VBT has? We > could just treat dev_priv->vbt as "VBT or what BIOS did", and do > dev_priv->vbt.lvds_use_ssc = true; here, possibly with a > DRM_DEBUG_KMS. It would simplify code

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: preserve SSC if previously set v2

2014-06-06 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 05 Jun 2014, Jesse Barnes wrote: > Some machines may have a broken VBT or no VBT at all, but we still want > to use SSC there. So check for it and keep it enabled if we see it > already on. Based on an earlier fix from Kristian. > > v2: honor modparam if set too (Daniel) > read out a

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: preserve SSC if previously set v2

2014-06-05 Thread Jesse Barnes
Some machines may have a broken VBT or no VBT at all, but we still want to use SSC there. So check for it and keep it enabled if we see it already on. Based on an earlier fix from Kristian. v2: honor modparam if set too (Daniel) read out at init time and store for panel_use_ssc() use (Jesse)