On Fri, 15 Aug 2014, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-08-15 at 12:48 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 Aug 2014, Imre Deak wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 19:33 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>> >> The series seems fine to me.
>> >>
>> >> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä
>> >> for the rest as wel
On Fri, 2014-08-15 at 12:48 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Aug 2014, Imre Deak wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 19:33 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> >> The series seems fine to me.
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä
> >> for the rest as well.
> >
> > Thanks, I assume it's for v2. I'd sa
On Fri, 15 Aug 2014, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 19:33 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>> The series seems fine to me.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä
>> for the rest as well.
>
> Thanks, I assume it's for v2. I'd say this is for -fixes. The problem
> existed even in 3.16, but only the
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 19:33 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> The series seems fine to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä
> for the rest as well.
Thanks, I assume it's for v2. I'd say this is for -fixes. The problem
existed even in 3.16, but only the MST support made it apparent with the
extra HPD s
The series seems fine to me.
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä
for the rest as well.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Atm, the HPD IRQ reenable timer can get rearmed right after it's
canceled. Also to access the HPD IRQ mask registers we need to wake up
the HW.
Solve both issues by converting the reenable timer to a delayed work and
grabbing a runtime PM reference in the work. By this we can also forgo
canceling