On 28/06/16 11:37, Imre Deak wrote:
Since wait_for_atomic doesn't re-check the wait-for condition after
expiry of the timeout it can fail when called from non-atomic context
even if the condition is set correctly before the expiry. Fix this by
using the non-atomic wait_for instead.
I noticed th
On 28/06/16 12:16, Imre Deak wrote:
On ti, 2016-06-28 at 12:05 +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 28/06/16 11:48, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 01:37:30PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
Since wait_for_atomic doesn't re-check the wait-for condition after
expiry of the timeout it can fail w
On ti, 2016-06-28 at 12:05 +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> On 28/06/16 11:48, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 01:37:30PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > > Since wait_for_atomic doesn't re-check the wait-for condition after
> > > expiry of the timeout it can fail when called from non-atom
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 12:05:42PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 28/06/16 11:48, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 01:37:30PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> >>Since wait_for_atomic doesn't re-check the wait-for condition after
> >>expiry of the timeout it can fail when called from no
On 28/06/16 11:48, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 01:37:30PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
Since wait_for_atomic doesn't re-check the wait-for condition after
expiry of the timeout it can fail when called from non-atomic context
even if the condition is set correctly before the expiry. F
On ti, 2016-06-28 at 11:48 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 01:37:30PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > Since wait_for_atomic doesn't re-check the wait-for condition after
> > expiry of the timeout it can fail when called from non-atomic
> > context
> > even if the condition is set c
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 01:37:30PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> Since wait_for_atomic doesn't re-check the wait-for condition after
> expiry of the timeout it can fail when called from non-atomic context
> even if the condition is set correctly before the expiry. Fix this by
> using the non-atomic wai
Since wait_for_atomic doesn't re-check the wait-for condition after
expiry of the timeout it can fail when called from non-atomic context
even if the condition is set correctly before the expiry. Fix this by
using the non-atomic wait_for instead.
I noticed this via the PLL locking timing out incor
