On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 12:01:30PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 01:15:21PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> > This patch is a stripped down version of the locking changes
> > necessary to support dynamic DMA-buf handling.
> >
> > It adds a dynamic flag for both importers as
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 01:15:21PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> This patch is a stripped down version of the locking changes
> necessary to support dynamic DMA-buf handling.
>
> It adds a dynamic flag for both importers as well as exporters
> so that drivers can choose if they want the reservat
This patch is a stripped down version of the locking changes
necessary to support dynamic DMA-buf handling.
It adds a dynamic flag for both importers as well as exporters
so that drivers can choose if they want the reservation object
locked or unlocked during mapping of attachments.
For compatibi
Am 16.10.19 um 16:23 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 3:46 PM Koenig, Christian
> wrote:
>> Am 08.10.19 um 10:55 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>>> On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 08:37:50AM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
Hi Daniel,
once more a ping on this. Any more comments or ca
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 3:46 PM Koenig, Christian
wrote:
>
> Am 08.10.19 um 10:55 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 08:37:50AM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
> >> Hi Daniel,
> >>
> >> once more a ping on this. Any more comments or can we get it comitted?
> > Sorry got a bit smash
Am 08.10.19 um 10:55 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 08:37:50AM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> once more a ping on this. Any more comments or can we get it comitted?
> Sorry got a bit smashed past weeks, but should be resurrected now back
> from xdc.
And any m
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 08:37:50AM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> once more a ping on this. Any more comments or can we get it comitted?
Sorry got a bit smashed past weeks, but should be resurrected now back
from xdc.
-Daniel
>
> Thanks,
> Christian.
>
> Am 24.09.19 um 11:50 s
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 04:29:14PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> This patch is a stripped down version of the locking changes
> necessary to support dynamic DMA-buf handling.
>
> For compatibility we cache the DMA-buf mapping as soon as
> exporter/importer disagree on the dynamic handling.
Nee
Hi Daniel,
once more a ping on this. Any more comments or can we get it comitted?
Thanks,
Christian.
Am 24.09.19 um 11:50 schrieb Christian König:
> Am 17.09.19 um 16:56 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>> [SNIP]
+ /* When either the importer or the exporter
can't handl
Am 17.09.19 um 16:56 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> [SNIP]
>>> +/* When either the importer or the exporter can't handle
>>> dynamic
>>> + * mappings we cache the mapping here to avoid issues with the
>>> + * reservation object lock.
>>> + */
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 4:47 PM Koenig, Christian
wrote:
>
> Am 17.09.19 um 15:45 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 01:24:10PM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
> >> Am 17.09.19 um 15:13 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> >>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 12:40:51PM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
Am 17.09.19 um 15:45 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 01:24:10PM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
>> Am 17.09.19 um 15:13 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 12:40:51PM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
Am 17.09.19 um 14:31 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Mon, Sep 1
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 01:24:10PM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
> Am 17.09.19 um 15:13 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 12:40:51PM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
> >> Am 17.09.19 um 14:31 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> >>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 02:23:13PM +0200, Christian König wr
Am 17.09.19 um 15:13 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 12:40:51PM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
>> Am 17.09.19 um 14:31 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 02:23:13PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
Ping? Any further comment on this or can't we merge at least the
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 12:40:51PM +, Koenig, Christian wrote:
> Am 17.09.19 um 14:31 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 02:23:13PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> >> Ping? Any further comment on this or can't we merge at least the locking
> >> change?
> > I was at plumbers ...
Am 17.09.19 um 14:31 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 02:23:13PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
>> Ping? Any further comment on this or can't we merge at least the locking
>> change?
> I was at plumbers ...
>> Christian.
>>
>> Am 11.09.19 um 12:53 schrieb Christian König:
>>> Am 03.0
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 02:23:13PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Ping? Any further comment on this or can't we merge at least the locking
> change?
I was at plumbers ...
>
> Christian.
>
> Am 11.09.19 um 12:53 schrieb Christian König:
> > Am 03.09.19 um 10:05 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > > On Th
Ping? Any further comment on this or can't we merge at least the locking
change?
Christian.
Am 11.09.19 um 12:53 schrieb Christian König:
Am 03.09.19 um 10:05 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 04:29:14PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
This patch is a stripped down version of the
Am 03.09.19 um 10:05 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 04:29:14PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
This patch is a stripped down version of the locking changes
necessary to support dynamic DMA-buf handling.
For compatibility we cache the DMA-buf mapping as soon as
exporter/importer di
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 04:29:14PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> This patch is a stripped down version of the locking changes
> necessary to support dynamic DMA-buf handling.
>
> For compatibility we cache the DMA-buf mapping as soon as
> exporter/importer disagree on the dynamic handling.
>
>
This patch is a stripped down version of the locking changes
necessary to support dynamic DMA-buf handling.
For compatibility we cache the DMA-buf mapping as soon as
exporter/importer disagree on the dynamic handling.
Signed-off-by: Christian König
---
drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 90 +++
21 matches
Mail list logo
