On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 10:36:21AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 09:22:49AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 10:07:56AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > Originally I've thought that this fixes up the reset issues on my
> > > gm45, but that was just a r
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 09:22:49AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 10:07:56AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Originally I've thought that this fixes up the reset issues on my
> > gm45, but that was just a red herring due to b0rked testing.
> >
> > Still I much prefer writing
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 10:07:56AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Originally I've thought that this fixes up the reset issues on my
> gm45, but that was just a red herring due to b0rked testing.
>
> Still I much prefer writing the right values (all other fields are
> reserved) instead of potentiall
Originally I've thought that this fixes up the reset issues on my
gm45, but that was just a red herring due to b0rked testing.
Still I much prefer writing the right values (all other fields are
reserved) instead of potentially dragging gunk around. Hence also
clear the register to 0 after a reset.
