On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 21:40:18 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:28:13AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 May 2012 12:31:56 +0200, Daniel Vetter
> > wrote:
> > > Instead of checking for !CPT, check for IBX to make it clearer that
> > > this is a IBX-specific workarou
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:28:13AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2012 12:31:56 +0200, Daniel Vetter
> wrote:
> > Instead of checking for !CPT, check for IBX to make it clearer that
> > this is a IBX-specific workaround. No functional change because we
> > smash the PPT PCH into the
On Wed, 30 May 2012 12:31:56 +0200, Daniel Vetter
wrote:
> Instead of checking for !CPT, check for IBX to make it clearer that
> this is a IBX-specific workaround. No functional change because we
> smash the PPT PCH into the HAS_PCH_CPT check and atm DP isn't enabled
> on the haswell LPT PCH yet.
Instead of checking for !CPT, check for IBX to make it clearer that
this is a IBX-specific workaround. No functional change because we
smash the PPT PCH into the HAS_PCH_CPT check and atm DP isn't enabled
on the haswell LPT PCH yet.
See Bspec Vol 3, Part 3, Section 4.[3-5].1 about DP[BCD], bit 30
