On Wed, 2022-08-31 at 15:34 +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 31.08.22 um 14:50 schrieb Matthew Auld:
> > On 31/08/2022 13:35, Christian König wrote:
> > > Am 31.08.22 um 14:06 schrieb Matthew Auld:
> > > > On 31/08/2022 12:03, Christian König wrote:
> > > > > Am 31.08.22 um 12:37 schrieb Matthew
On 01/09/2022 09:00, Christian König wrote:
Am 31.08.22 um 18:32 schrieb Matthew Auld:
On 31/08/2022 15:53, Matthew Auld wrote:
On 31/08/2022 14:34, Christian König wrote:
Am 31.08.22 um 14:50 schrieb Matthew Auld:
On 31/08/2022 13:35, Christian König wrote:
Am 31.08.22 um 14:06 schrieb Matt
On 31/08/2022 15:53, Matthew Auld wrote:
On 31/08/2022 14:34, Christian König wrote:
Am 31.08.22 um 14:50 schrieb Matthew Auld:
On 31/08/2022 13:35, Christian König wrote:
Am 31.08.22 um 14:06 schrieb Matthew Auld:
On 31/08/2022 12:03, Christian König wrote:
Am 31.08.22 um 12:37 schrieb Matt
On 31/08/2022 14:34, Christian König wrote:
Am 31.08.22 um 14:50 schrieb Matthew Auld:
On 31/08/2022 13:35, Christian König wrote:
Am 31.08.22 um 14:06 schrieb Matthew Auld:
On 31/08/2022 12:03, Christian König wrote:
Am 31.08.22 um 12:37 schrieb Matthew Auld:
[SNIP]
That hopefully just le
On 31/08/2022 13:35, Christian König wrote:
Am 31.08.22 um 14:06 schrieb Matthew Auld:
On 31/08/2022 12:03, Christian König wrote:
Am 31.08.22 um 12:37 schrieb Matthew Auld:
[SNIP]
That hopefully just leaves i915_ttm_shrink(), which is swapping
out shmem ttm_tt and is calling ttm_bo_validat
On 31/08/2022 12:03, Christian König wrote:
Am 31.08.22 um 12:37 schrieb Matthew Auld:
[SNIP]
That hopefully just leaves i915_ttm_shrink(), which is swapping out
shmem ttm_tt and is calling ttm_bo_validate() with empty placements
to force the pipeline-gutting path, which importantly unpopula
On 31/08/2022 10:38, Christian König wrote:
Am 31.08.22 um 11:26 schrieb Matthew Auld:
On 31/08/2022 09:16, Christian König wrote:
Hi Matthew,
Am 30.08.22 um 12:45 schrieb Matthew Auld:
Hi,
On 30/08/2022 08:33, Christian König wrote:
Hi guys,
can we get an rb/acked-by for this i915 change?
Make sure we can at least move and alloc TT objects without backing store.
v2: clear the tt object even when no resource is allocated.
Signed-off-by: Christian König
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c | 6 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c | 2 +-
2 files changed
On 31/08/2022 09:16, Christian König wrote:
Hi Matthew,
Am 30.08.22 um 12:45 schrieb Matthew Auld:
Hi,
On 30/08/2022 08:33, Christian König wrote:
Hi guys,
can we get an rb/acked-by for this i915 change?
Basically we are just making sure that the driver doesn't crash when
bo->resource is N
Hi,
On 30/08/2022 08:33, Christian König wrote:
Hi guys,
can we get an rb/acked-by for this i915 change?
Basically we are just making sure that the driver doesn't crash when
bo->resource is NULL and a bo doesn't have any backing store assigned to
it.
The Intel CI seems to be happy with thi
On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 at 12:46, Christian König
wrote:
>
> Make sure we can at least move and alloc TT objects without backing store.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c | 6 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c | 2 +-
> 2 files
Make sure we can at least move and alloc TT objects without backing store.
Signed-off-by: Christian König
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c | 6 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/d
12 matches
Mail list logo