On Tuesday, November 10, 2015 09:20:56 AM Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On 11/06/2015 05:08 AM, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > intel_runtime_pm_disable() takes an extra rpm reference which combined
> > with the one we leak from intel_display_set_init_power() leaves t
On 11/06/2015 05:08 AM, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> intel_runtime_pm_disable() takes an extra rpm reference which combined
> with the one we leak from intel_display_set_init_power() leaves the
> usage count at +1 after the driver has been unloaded.
> The origina
From: Ville Syrjälä
intel_runtime_pm_disable() takes an extra rpm reference which combined
with the one we leak from intel_display_set_init_power() leaves the
usage count at +1 after the driver has been unloaded.
The original ref is dropped explicitly in intel_runtime_pm_enable().
So the next tim
