On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 11:28:05AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 12:16:13PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 10:45:50AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > Whilst running the shrinker, we need to hold a reference as we unbind
> > > the objects, or else we
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 12:16:13PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 10:45:50AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Whilst running the shrinker, we need to hold a reference as we unbind
> > the objects, or else we may end up waiting for and retiring requests,
> > which in turn may re
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 10:45:50AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Whilst running the shrinker, we need to hold a reference as we unbind
> the objects, or else we may end up waiting for and retiring requests,
> which in turn may result in this object being freed.
>
> This is very similar to the evict
Whilst running the shrinker, we need to hold a reference as we unbind
the objects, or else we may end up waiting for and retiring requests,
which in turn may result in this object being freed.
This is very similar to the eviction code which also has to be very
careful to keep a reference to its ob
