On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 01:50:13PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 02:51:19PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 04:31:14PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
> > wrote:
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä
> > >
> > > Currently intel_gen4_compute_page_offset() s
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 02:51:19PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 04:31:14PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > Currently intel_gen4_compute_page_offset() simply picks the closest
> > page boundary below the linear offset. That howeve
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 04:31:14PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> Currently intel_gen4_compute_page_offset() simply picks the closest
> page boundary below the linear offset. That however may not be suitably
> aligned to satisfy any hardware specific restric
From: Ville Syrjälä
Currently intel_gen4_compute_page_offset() simply picks the closest
page boundary below the linear offset. That however may not be suitably
aligned to satisfy any hardware specific restrictions. So let's make
sure the page boundary we choose is properly aligned.
Also to play
