On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 08:55:39AM -0500, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 08:56:52AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >
> > On 23/11/2021 19:52, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 09:39:25AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 17/11/2021 22:49, Vinay Belgaum
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 08:56:52AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 23/11/2021 19:52, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 09:39:25AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > >
> > > On 17/11/2021 22:49, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
> > > > From: Chris Wilson
> > > >
> > > > Everytime we come
On 23/11/2021 19:52, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 09:39:25AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 17/11/2021 22:49, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
From: Chris Wilson
Everytime we come to the end of a virtual engine's context, re-randomise
it's siblings[]. As we schedule the siblings' ta
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 09:39:25AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 17/11/2021 22:49, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
> > From: Chris Wilson
> >
> > Everytime we come to the end of a virtual engine's context, re-randomise
> > it's siblings[]. As we schedule the siblings' tasklets in the order they
>
On 17/11/2021 22:49, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
From: Chris Wilson
Everytime we come to the end of a virtual engine's context, re-randomise
it's siblings[]. As we schedule the siblings' tasklets in the order they
are in the array, earlier entries are executed first (when idle) and so
will be pre
From: Chris Wilson
Everytime we come to the end of a virtual engine's context, re-randomise
it's siblings[]. As we schedule the siblings' tasklets in the order they
are in the array, earlier entries are executed first (when idle) and so
will be preferred when scheduling the next virtual request.
