Hi Lionel,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on drm-intel/for-linux-next]
[also build test WARNING on v4.17-rc5 next-20180516]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github
Hi Lionel,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on drm-intel/for-linux-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.17-rc5 next-20180515]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0da
Hi Lionel,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on drm-intel/for-linux-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.17-rc5 next-20180515]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0da
On 15/05/18 15:10, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2018-05-15 14:57:44)
We don't actually need this information in i915 but we would like to
get it in IGT and since the pciid headers are in sync..
Hmm, I don't see that we display the GT anywhere. I was thinking an
immediate use-c
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2018-05-15 14:57:44)
> We don't actually need this information in i915 but we would like to
> get it in IGT and since the pciid headers are in sync..
Hmm, I don't see that we display the GT anywhere. I was thinking an
immediate use-case for this information would be the
We don't actually need this information in i915 but we would like to
get it in IGT and since the pciid headers are in sync..
Here we're splitting the CNL platforms into 2 groups :
- GT1: including GT0.5/GT1 platforms (1 slice)
- GT2: including GT1.5/GT2 platforms (2 slices)
Signed-off-by:
